Comments on: Taking Content Generation to the Next Level http://seocracy.com/2008/03/taking-content-generation-to-the-next-level/ A blog about technical SEO, Ruby, Web Apps, and more Mon, 05 Jul 2010 17:10:23 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2 hourly 1 By: nickycakes http://seocracy.com/2008/03/taking-content-generation-to-the-next-level/comment-page-1/#comment-408 nickycakes Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000 http://127.0.0.1/seocracy/?p=65#comment-408 while i disagree with that linking strategy, and with the idea that you can only put 5 blogs on 1 ip, i like the article.  spot on as usual with most of it =) while i disagree with that linking strategy, and with the idea that you can only put 5 blogs on 1 ip, i like the article.  spot on as usual with most of it =)

]]> By: Rob http://seocracy.com/2008/03/taking-content-generation-to-the-next-level/comment-page-1/#comment-409 Rob Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000 http://127.0.0.1/seocracy/?p=65#comment-409 <p>What?!?!</p><p><br />You disagree with me on my own blog????????!</p><p> </p><p>I'm so fucking offended right now. </p> What?!?!

You disagree with me on my own blog????????!

 

I'm so fucking offended right now. 

]]> By: nickycakes http://seocracy.com/2008/03/taking-content-generation-to-the-next-level/comment-page-1/#comment-410 nickycakes Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000 http://127.0.0.1/seocracy/?p=65#comment-410 <p>Haha, you know I love you.  Yeah, as I was saying I've tried interlinking spammy blogs and what ends up happening is, if one gets shut down, they all end up getting shut down.  You would do better not interlinking them and using whatever strategies you can to build inbound links from external sources, and then linking them individually to money sites, not eachother.</p><p>As for IP's, you can pack em in pretty good on shared hosting, and for the cost, you can good number of accounts for the price of a dedi. </p> Haha, you know I love you.  Yeah, as I was saying I've tried interlinking spammy blogs and what ends up happening is, if one gets shut down, they all end up getting shut down.  You would do better not interlinking them and using whatever strategies you can to build inbound links from external sources, and then linking them individually to money sites, not eachother.

As for IP's, you can pack em in pretty good on shared hosting, and for the cost, you can good number of accounts for the price of a dedi.

]]> By: ed http://seocracy.com/2008/03/taking-content-generation-to-the-next-level/comment-page-1/#comment-411 ed Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000 http://127.0.0.1/seocracy/?p=65#comment-411 <p>I think I disagree with you on the linking as well.  You can certainly put more than 5 blogs on one IP.  If your concerned with things just make 5 blogs on topic 1, 5 blogs on topic 2, etc.....  </p><p>Most of the shared hosts give you so much space and bandwidth these days you can fit 40 blogs on some of them with zero problems (even semi - popular ones).</p><p>If you interlink and get busted - you can usually get away with it on the other topics.  At least from what's happened to me lately.  I don't do much interlinking sitewide at all anymore - so when I do interlink it's from deep pages and just a few instead of hundreds of pages.  Might make a difference if your linking sitewide though - </p><p> </p><p> </p> I think I disagree with you on the linking as well.  You can certainly put more than 5 blogs on one IP.  If your concerned with things just make 5 blogs on topic 1, 5 blogs on topic 2, etc….. 

Most of the shared hosts give you so much space and bandwidth these days you can fit 40 blogs on some of them with zero problems (even semi – popular ones).

If you interlink and get busted – you can usually get away with it on the other topics.  At least from what's happened to me lately.  I don't do much interlinking sitewide at all anymore – so when I do interlink it's from deep pages and just a few instead of hundreds of pages.  Might make a difference if your linking sitewide though –

 

 

]]> By: Seduction Chronicles http://seocracy.com/2008/03/taking-content-generation-to-the-next-level/comment-page-1/#comment-412 Seduction Chronicles Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000 http://127.0.0.1/seocracy/?p=65#comment-412 Yeah just generate original content on the spam blogs and let them be for a while. They get good rankings. Yeah just generate original content on the spam blogs and let them be for a while. They get good rankings.

]]> By: inok http://seocracy.com/2008/03/taking-content-generation-to-the-next-level/comment-page-1/#comment-413 inok Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000 http://127.0.0.1/seocracy/?p=65#comment-413 I'm interested in buying a database, but the question is how many times you sell one? How it is possible to import one into WordPress to be readable as articles or posts? I'm interested in buying a database, but the question is how many times you sell one? How it is possible to import one into WordPress to be readable as articles or posts?

]]> By: jimbo2779 http://seocracy.com/2008/03/taking-content-generation-to-the-next-level/comment-page-1/#comment-414 jimbo2779 Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000 http://127.0.0.1/seocracy/?p=65#comment-414 <p>I also agree on the more than 5 per IP but then with my dedi setup i will be maxing out at 10 per IP. I dont really do spam as i hate geting de-indexedso im more about the scrape and madlib. Country specific sites are easy to madlib with if you can get a good DB of facts and stats about different countries / states.</p><p> If I interlink all my scraped sites that have been scraped from lesser sites, i.e. sites with fewer links but older domains, what are the chances i get de-indexed? I have yet to have  scraped site banned so I am pushing forward with my scraped sites hoping they will love me long time.</p> I also agree on the more than 5 per IP but then with my dedi setup i will be maxing out at 10 per IP. I dont really do spam as i hate geting de-indexedso im more about the scrape and madlib. Country specific sites are easy to madlib with if you can get a good DB of facts and stats about different countries / states.

 If I interlink all my scraped sites that have been scraped from lesser sites, i.e. sites with fewer links but older domains, what are the chances i get de-indexed? I have yet to have  scraped site banned so I am pushing forward with my scraped sites hoping they will love me long time.

]]>